| Author | Message |
BlackCloud
161 posts |
#69432 2008-05-17 15:12 GMT |
|
sorry, *stalemate |
|
CaffineAddict
159 posts |
#69433 2008-05-17 15:16 GMT |
|
I don't know much about chess but I think it's stalemate.
|
|
GuitarsRock
138 posts |
#69434 2008-05-17 15:16 GMT |
|
Stalemate. Think about it, the king has an attack.check range of one square. so if you get close enough to check the other king with your king then your in check too.
|
|
fruitsalad
153 posts |
#69435 2008-05-17 15:17 GMT |
|
Its annoyingly gay. I guess u shud call for a LONG recess ;)
|
|
GiddyUp
137 posts |
#69436 2008-05-17 16:36 GMT |
|
a king can not check a king so it look like that will be stalemate partner
|
|
Lucky
150 posts |
#69437 2008-05-17 16:37 GMT |
|
It's definitely NOT a stalemate. Stalemate occurs when one side cannot make a move and his king is not directly attacked.
With only two kings you get a draw by insufficient material. |
|
Sweetlips
140 posts |
#69438 2008-05-17 16:37 GMT |
|
Its called a draw by insufficient material. Stalemate is when the king is not in check. but cannot move because he would move into check.
|
|
RollingSands
141 posts |
#69439 2008-05-17 16:46 GMT |
|
Draw by insufficient material.In that case there isn't any pieces to give checkmate
|
|
Heat2010
137 posts |
#69440 2008-05-17 21:29 GMT |
|
draw, it is not stalemate because only 2 king's left in the board
|
|
Highclimber
158 posts |
#69441 2008-05-17 22:38 GMT |
|
Has to be a stalemate man theres way a king can put another king in check by itself
|
|
Polarize
139 posts |
#69442 2008-05-17 23:23 GMT |
|
It is a stalemate.....(Tech-the guy above-what your talking about is checkmate).
It would almost seem as if someone cheated....hmmmmmmmmmm |
|
